VT Was Right Again: MH17 and the Undying BUK Scam
Posted by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on June 3, 2015
Ukraine had long admitted it had SU25's "following" the plane
Back in 2014, German forensic investigators proved
conclusively that MH17 was shot down by another aircraft. The Ukraine
had long admitted it had SU25's "following" the plane but claimed they
couldn't fly that high.
VT with the help of Chip Tatum, proved that it could have been any
aircraft because radar spoofing allows any plane to appear as any other,
altering not only plane type but altitude and speed as well. Israel
has supplied this technology to the Kiev regime. It is not known if
they used it or not.
We could discuss the Dutch investigation but we would rather not. No
rational person would trust the Dutch, the long controlled and
corrupted "monkeyboys" who succumb to pressure from anyone. Do we want
to discuss the Dutch as peacekeepers in Bosnia? Ouch.
Then something even stranger
happened, when you went on the internet, suddenly the SU25 could only
fly 15,000 or 20,000 feet as its "operational ceiling." We
investigated. It seemed this was not the real capability of the plane
at all. I appeared on an interview show on RT with Russian pilots who
regularly flew SU25's at up to 47,000 feet. The US shows the SU25 to
have a real ceiling of 52,000 feet. Why the lying?
Now it gets worse. The Moscow Times, working with an anti-Putin
group claimed it had proof a BUK missile was used, but by the Kiev
regime. As no missile was seen to be launched in the middle of the day,
this is extremely unlikely, this and the fact that MH17 wasn't shot
down by a BUK missile. Then we investigated the Moscow Times and the "anti-Putin" group.
We found the Moscow Times is a
front for Booz Allen Hamilton, a CIA contractor and not a Russian
publication at all. Then we traced the source in Russia and found it to
be an employee of Radio Liberty, another CIA front funded by the US
government and managed by "the Broadcast Committee," a nefarious group
of neocons and Bush cronies including Donald Rumsfeld.
Then a couple of days ago, the manufacturer of the
BUK missile said it was their missile, of course, without any evidence,
but claimed it was a Ukraine version, not Russian.
All this obfuscation for one reason, to bury all real evidence that
would lead to the real conclusion, one that could be actually proven,
that an SU25 or some other aircraft, flown by Kiev, shot MH17 down.
As long as the door is kept open for the BUK cover story, MH17 will
run for decades, a controlled opposition circus like "9/11 Truth" with
their "nanothermite," a substance never produced that would be
immediately debunked by any real court. The same thing is being done
here, a curiously "Israeli" way of acting as it were.
30mm cannon fire trajectory evidence
Then today, RT, who gets suckered all the time, jumping from one
planted story to another, not so bad as Press TV, but not so careful
either, gets the story right because the one real witness has decided
that it is safer to be in Russia than as a liability in Kiev.
Russian investigators reveal identity of key witness in MH17 crash
The Russian Investigative Committee has identified a key witness to
the MH17 crash in Ukraine's Donetsk Region. He is Evgeny Agapov, an
aviation armaments mechanic in the Ukrainian Air Force.
The man is currently under Russian state protection.
Screenshot from Russian Investigative Committee video
"As now there is new evidence of the reliability of
the words of the witness, as well as various reports concerning the
doubts of certain media outlets about the real existence of this
witness, we decided to disclose ," Investigative Committee spokesman Vladimir Markin said.
Screenshot from Russian Investigative Committee video
Agapov, a Ukrainian citizen, was serving as a military mechanic in
the first squadron of the Ukrainian Air Force's tactical aviation
brigade.
According to Markin, the man "voluntarily crossed the state
border of the Russian Federation and expressed a desire to cooperate
with the Russian investigation."
Agapov has testified that on July 17, 2014, a Ukrainian Sukhoi Su-25 jet aircraft piloted by one Captain Voloshin "set out for a military task," Markin said.
Head of the Media
Relations department of the Russian Investigative Committee Vladimir
Markin (RIA Novosti / Alexander Natruskin)
The aircraft returned to the airfield with empty ammunition. To his colleagues, Voloshin said that the plane was "at the wrong time or in the wrong place," said the Investigative Committee spokesman."Our jets were flying regularly," Agapov said in his testimony. "When one returned, the pilot, Captain Voloshin, got out of the cockpit." He added that, as Captain Voloshin walked away with the other pilots, Agapov heard him say: "That was the wrong plane.""In the evening we learned that a passenger Boeing was shot down that day," the witness said.
He said that on that day, July 17, the soldiers together with Agapov were "servicing another jet, attaching its payload.""Nearby was Flight Control Officer Dyakin,
Captain Voloshin and two other pilots. Dyakin asked Voloshin: 'What
happened with the plane?' He said, 'It was in the wrong place at the wrong time.'"
↧